In the wake of the latest
mass murder, this time in Orlando, Florida, a predictable war of
words has exploded as various factions go to their separate corners with their competing
interpretations. For some, the attack was all about homophobia. For others it
was all about Islamic terrorism. And then there are those who just prefer to blame
it all on "hate."
Of
course, in the real world - rather than the world of ideologically preset
certitudes - one factor doesn't necessarily exclude any of the others.
Homophobia, Islamic terrorism, and generic "hate" can all coexist
quite conveniently in an individual, in a group, in a society. They could all
easily have coexisted as components of this particular criminal's mindset and
contributed to his crime. A complete investigation may in time sort out which,
if any, were the more dominant influences in his thinking. But the inconvenient
truth is that human beings are incredibly complex creatures, capable of holding
multiple (and even contradictory) ideas at the same time, and may be motivated
by multiple (and even contradictory) hostilities and allegiances.
Sometimes
those allegiances inspire us in positive ways. But sometimes they inspire the
sort of hostility and hatred we have witnessed so much of in our lifetimes. And
sometimes it is our own anxieties that inspire hostilities and hatreds that
then go in search of suitable allegiances to offer them some meaning and
purpose.
Our
particularly poisonous politics may make all that even worse, as certainly our
unprecedented contemporary interconnectedness through our toxic modern media
make it worse; but hostilities and hatreds are not new, any more than the
competing allegiances our anxieties seek refuge in.
Hence the
uniquely liberating character – in a world of social stratification, economic
inequality, and political polarization - of Saint Paul’s message that he
proclaimed to the Galatians: you are all
children of God in Christ Jesus. … there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is
neither slave nor free, there is not male and female; for you are all one in
Christ Jesus.
But what makes Saint Paul’s claim any different,
what makes his message any more powerful, than any other competing set of
slogans?
A good question – one that comes naturally to us
living as we do in a world of slogans!
The answer, for Paul, is clear. All our competing
allegiances – and the hostilities and hatreds they inspire and that in turn
make us try to double-down on those same allegiances – all are subsumed in a
new belonging, not to words nor even to an idea, but to a person, the person
Paul calls Christ Jesus, the same
Jesus whom Peter called the Christ of
God, whose identity with all of us is so central that he calls himself
simply the Son of Man.
What Paul calls clothing
oneself in Christ and belonging to
Christ involves more than Peter’s partial perception and understanding of
Jesus’ identity and mission. Rather it requires a full and complete
identification with and embrace of Jesus, who undermines everything else in his
chosen mission as Son of Man.
Peter and his colleagues didn’t understand at first.
Why would they? Nothing in their experience of how the world works – of how we
function (or sometimes don’t function) in our world - had really prepared them
for Jesus’ challenge, for Jesus’ insistence that only his passion, death, and
resurrection really reveal who he is – and in the process undermine every
alternative outlook on life, every alternative allegiance, every alternative
answer to our insecurity and frustration.
Jesus defines his followers in terms of how fully we
identify our experience with his and in the process allow ourselves to be
remade by his example and according to his direction.
Homily for the 12th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Immaculate Conception Church, Knoxville, TN, June 19, 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment